{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/26/2015 12:37:59 PM
1
I discredited your sources with logical fallacy espousing, I countered your claims effectively and even got you to agree with me but your pride got in the way, and I never once made a claim that I couldn't support or made a quote of which I could assume plausible deniability of its subject in case I was wrong
I demolished you 90% of the way
English
-
You did nothing but try to find technicalities. You never once showed anything I provided to be false. But, if it helps you sleep better at night...
-
Actually, the articles I linked showed you the fuk up kek. I rekt your shite this whole way through by poking out your hypocrisy and logical errors and your breaking of the rules of arguments
-
No sir. I referred you to a few people that provide evidence for the position I hold. But, instead of listening to them and countering their arguments, you sent me a link defining appeal to authority. Then you went off on some tangent about the shroud of Turin, which I never mentioned. And to top it all off, you started your argument about something that was completely unrelated to the op.
-
Edited by Azazel9876: 8/26/2015 1:00:39 PMI dismissed your people because to even consider them would be to commit a logical error! Not only that, I researched the backgrounds of the people and found that they were entirely of your faith and therefore could also not be trusted. The Shroud of Turin was something I brought up to another member and you interjected an idea which PERFECTLY made sense such as [quote]lack of a body[/quote] and shite like that. You purposely were either deceptive or responding to the wrong question in a bid to discredit me off a stupid end. You don't answer something with a logical response and not expect to be questioned about it and then claim you're being misrepresented when you say that you weren't talking about the Shroud. You cannot play a victim with me, kiddo, I've been fighting feminazis for years I addressed the OP very early and also very late on. You have no argument so you just keep squealing the same thing.
-
In regards to dismissing the people I named: I was not referring to them and asking you to believe them, I was asking you to listen to what they had to say and make your own informed deductions. By your reasoning, I can't listen to anything an atheist scientist has to say because they support an opposing position. Which just further demonstrates what I said to you many times: you aren't interested in truth, you seek only to justify your presuppositions. Truth is truth, no matter the source. And you continue to show that you are willingly ignorant.
-
I pointed out an obvious flaw in your logic so you accuse me of doing the same? Hilarious, mate, but I never once presented a person as you did. Truth isn't found in people, but rather the physical world
-
And people can present evidence from the physical world.
-
I don't care what people say. I want facts that do not require another to say them. People are biased and can skew the numbers to support their view. I want raw data. Basic principles.
-
The majority of everything you know comes from other people. You're being illogical.
-
Youre being illogical by making the assumption that I use what other people tell me and that I don't think for myself and experiment myself. You're being illogical by being a douchenozzle to everyone not of the faith and then saying that this makes their evidence invalid. You're being illogical by telling people that the truth is God and the Bible all over this thread yet say that you aren't assuming it and aren't trying to spread faith
-
I'm sorry you feel that way.
