{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/27/2015 8:13:10 PM
20
Ironically, the stats you posted demonstrate that hunters are overpowered - the exact opposite of your initial claim.
I'll also note that it doesn't say whether the class breakdown stat is weighted by hours played. It's useless if it's not. Particularly since we get 3 character slots, meaning that most players will have one of each class showing up, biasing that stat toward equilibrium.
English
-
You need to work on your reading comprehension and come back to this thread.
-
Edited by goldenfetus: 8/27/2015 8:31:47 PMYOU: "If you whine about Hunters' subclasses, or Titans being OP: it's a you-problem." STATS YOU POSTED: Out of 6 subclasses, ONLY the Hunter's 2 subclasses have a positive average K/D in Crucible. Hunters are also the most-selected class for PvP, by a greater margin when looking only at top players, and have the most super kills by far. Tell me again what I misread, shit-feasting retard.
-
Edited by chill: 8/27/2015 8:35:46 PMHe's suggesting that you didn't get what he was saying when you called him out. He isn't saying hunters are underpowered. He's suggesting hunters shouldn't whine about being underpowered and titans aren't OP based on the usage stats.
-
It seems as though you missed: [i][quote]Recently there have been more and more Hunters weeping over their subclasses being too weak. Which is, of course, complete rubbish.[/quote][/i] ...just under the TLDR.
-
Edited by goldenfetus: 8/27/2015 8:39:51 PMThe problem isn't with my interpretation. It's with your writing. Your initial statement is ambiguous because you used OR instead of AND. The most common complaint about subclass power is that Hunters are overpowered, so that's the obvious assumption of what you meant. I've NEVER seen anyone seriously complain that TITANS are overpowered. Do you have any examples? It's obvious to everyone I know that Hunters dominate Crucible.
-
[quote]The problem isn't with my interpretation.[/quote] Yes it is. [quote]It's with your writing. Your initial statement is ambiguous because you used OR instead of AND.[/quote] It's "or" because people don't necessarily complain about Hunters being underpowered AND titans being overpowered. It's usually either or. The problem very much is with your reading skills, stop making stupid excuses. [quote]I've NEVER seen anyone seriously complain that TITANS are overpowered. Do you have any examples? It's obvious to everyone I know that Hunters dominate Crucible.[/quote] Does the world revolve around you? No. Just because [i]you[/i] haven't noticed something, doesn't mean other's haven't. Just last night there was a noob complaining about Defenders' Ward of Dawn being too OP. Why would I care if you know that Hunters dominate in PvP? This topic is aimed at those who DON'T. You should just man the hell up and apologize for being a stupid asshat who can't read.
-
[quote]Yes it is.[/quote] It really isn't, though. "If you whine about Hunters' subclasses" is one of two options in your first OR statement. I don't think anyone has ever (seriously) argued that Hunters are underpowered, leaving the interpretation of that statement clear. If Hunters are underpowered, then Titans or Warlocks MUST necessarily be overpowered. Since you EXPLICITLY referred to Titans as OP in the same line, it's clear you aren't talking about Warlocks. Therefore, you ought to have used an "AND". [quote]Does the world revolve around you?[/quote] My statements don't require the world to revolve around me. It's COMMON KNOWLEDGE that hunters are overpowered, not simply my observation. Find someone saying Titan's are OP (most likely in jest), and you'll see dozens of people correcting them - just as you see in this very thread. I apologize for calling you names. I WAS wrong about what you meant in your topic. But I WASN'T wrong because of poor reading comprehension. I was wrong because your sentence was poorly worded, and the clarification was buried in a poorly-formatted wall of text that was unnecessarily repeating the information from your link.
-
His post [b]makes perfect -blam!-ing sense. [/b] In no way can it possibly be interpreted to mean anything other than what it does. It was not poorly worded. It was competently clear, concise, and direct.
-
"If you whine about Hunters' subclasses" In your mind, that statement CANNOT mean whining that Hunter subclasses are overpowered. It can ONLY mean they are underpowered, despite no indication of that meaning whatsoever?
-
Edited by easydoesitEZ: 8/27/2015 9:36:59 PMHunters post threads here CONSTANTLY saying Titans are OP and FoH should be nerfed, and they say Hunter is the weakest class with the weakest supers. They complain that gunslinger gets no shield, and they complain because a well timed FoH denies their arc blade. They actually believe they should be able to arc blade a Titan during FoH. It's obvious to YOU and ME and a lot of people, but it's CLEARLY not obvious to a LARGE group of people on these forums, and no matter what you tell them, THEY ARGUE and argue and argue. The ONLY hope we have of shutting them up to to provide irrefutable proof, which is WHAT THIS POST IS ALL ABOUT. FFS, just look at some of them commenting in this thread. So yes, IT IS a problem with your interpretation. Try to keep up, cupcake.
-
Got any examples? I'll bet that any thread you post is going to be filled with nothing but rebuttals, with VERY few people agreeing - proving that it's common knowledge Hunters are OP.
-
There are already [b]people in this thread. I don't need to post links, because there are 40 comments down below trying to argue that Hunters are underpowered in PvP. [/b] What you'll also notice, are 40 more comments from people saying thank you, [b]because they're tired of people posting about how underpowered Hunters are.[/b] If that doesn't sink in, than you're clearly mentally handicapped.
-
Nope. Reviewed pages and pages of comments. Exactly as I said, there's one guy claiming hunters are underpowered in PvP, with over a dozen responses to him. The rest are agreeing with the obvious. Copy the 40 comments and link them here or you're a lying shitstain.
-
Trollhard tactic #1: Say something stupid. When called out on dumbass statement, blame someone else. When all else fails, start an argument about something else to retract from original dumbass statement. Nobody needs to provide proof of anything for you. You misunderstood the OP. End of story. You could have simply said you misunderstood and walked away, but instead your trollhard instincts kicked in.
-
Wrong again, shit-slurper. I admitted my fault to OP. Now you and I are engaged in a second discussion about whether or not there are 40 people in this thread arguing that Titans are OP - a claim you still have no evidence for.
-
Trollhard tactic #2: When in doubt, call people names because they think it somehow makes them more credible.
-
Wait, you're describing your own posts? I thought you were replying to me.
-
Trollhard tactic #3: Use grade school arguing tactics such as the classic "I know you are but what am I" argument. You're just going through all of the trollhard motions. You're like a super trollhard!
-
That wasn't my argument at all. I was pointing out that YOU began with the insults. Just as YOU are trying to take attention from your own idiotic statements. TARDRAGE Tactic #1: When your flaws are pointed out, ignore the post. Then accuse your opponent of precisely the fallacies you've committed.
-
Says u..
