These posts just annoy me (not offending logical people like OP, just saying). Each class just has to be used a certain way. People act like their poor performance in the Crucible is somehow attributed to balance issues all the time. If you claim to be a good player, know that a good player doesn't have to have a specific subclass to succeed (not to excel, just to succeed). I'm not a top tier player in PvP. Is it because my Hunter is too weak? No, it's because I don't have the skill. To the people who claim that certain things don't require skill, I advise being ready for such a situation. If you see a Bladedancer (which isn't some skill-devoid super), know how to react.
English
-
The fact that the average titan has the lowest average kd means that if you wanna succeed you are better off with a hunter.
-
I didn't say they weren't unbalanced. You have a slightly higher chance of succeeding as one of the Hunter classes, if you and the other player are of the same skill level. It's people acting like all their failings are because of imbalance that get me angry
-
Agreed however it also can be added that those actually work depending how one use their character better.
-
I main a Titan and have played him since September. When trials came out I was excited to get the gear. 3 Weeks later I was able to get the packages but not flawless. I'm decent at PvP but only really played it during Iron Banner. I decided to make a hunter and after 10 hours I had a level 34. I headed into trials and quickly mastered blink. A couple of times I got really close to flawless but failed. That entire time I thought to myself how much more powerful my hunter was in pvp. Not because of my playstyle but because the abilities I had access to. An easy escape, A mobile super, Invisibility and a longer range melee.