[quote]The problem isn't with my interpretation.[/quote]
Yes it is.
[quote]It's with your writing. Your initial statement is ambiguous because you used OR instead of AND.[/quote]
It's "or" because people don't necessarily complain about Hunters being underpowered AND titans being overpowered. It's usually either or. The problem very much is with your reading skills, stop making stupid excuses.
[quote]I've NEVER seen anyone seriously complain that TITANS are overpowered. Do you have any examples? It's obvious to everyone I know that Hunters dominate Crucible.[/quote]
Does the world revolve around you? No. Just because [i]you[/i] haven't noticed something, doesn't mean other's haven't. Just last night there was a noob complaining about Defenders' Ward of Dawn being too OP.
Why would I care if you know that Hunters dominate in PvP? This topic is aimed at those who DON'T.
You should just man the hell up and apologize for being a stupid asshat who can't read.
English
-
[quote]Yes it is.[/quote] It really isn't, though. "If you whine about Hunters' subclasses" is one of two options in your first OR statement. I don't think anyone has ever (seriously) argued that Hunters are underpowered, leaving the interpretation of that statement clear. If Hunters are underpowered, then Titans or Warlocks MUST necessarily be overpowered. Since you EXPLICITLY referred to Titans as OP in the same line, it's clear you aren't talking about Warlocks. Therefore, you ought to have used an "AND". [quote]Does the world revolve around you?[/quote] My statements don't require the world to revolve around me. It's COMMON KNOWLEDGE that hunters are overpowered, not simply my observation. Find someone saying Titan's are OP (most likely in jest), and you'll see dozens of people correcting them - just as you see in this very thread. I apologize for calling you names. I WAS wrong about what you meant in your topic. But I WASN'T wrong because of poor reading comprehension. I was wrong because your sentence was poorly worded, and the clarification was buried in a poorly-formatted wall of text that was unnecessarily repeating the information from your link.
-
His post [b]makes perfect -blam!-ing sense. [/b] In no way can it possibly be interpreted to mean anything other than what it does. It was not poorly worded. It was competently clear, concise, and direct.
-
"If you whine about Hunters' subclasses" In your mind, that statement CANNOT mean whining that Hunter subclasses are overpowered. It can ONLY mean they are underpowered, despite no indication of that meaning whatsoever?