{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/27/2015 10:13:33 PM
1
-
Incorrect. This is the very reason we use per capita when we measure income, crime etc. Per capita is a method to compare using equal group sizes when the populations vary in size.
-
More kills per super use = better Should've clarified that.
-
Edited by TechRonin: 8/27/2015 11:00:38 PMSorry don't see a stat on how many times a super was cast. I see super kills and a percentages associated with a subclass. It would be pure speculation to say supers were cast an equal amount of time for every subclass.
-
The poster said that the Hunters super "is a roaming super" which accounts for the inflated number of kills and also somehow invalidates the OPs statement. I was replying to that. I'm not making a statement regarding the statistics, I am making a statement regarding the posters logic process. Roaming super = more kills (according to poster), and more kills = better super. In other words, his logic is flawed. I didn't make any argument concerning his analysis of the actual statistics.
