{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/28/2015 1:18:51 AM
1
he wasnt saying they are overpowered, only that statistically, they are on top (and not by a cripplingly huge margin either).
English
-
Warlocks are higher for 2/3 of the categories though. And by the way he wrote this and how he doesn't have hunter he is kind of trying to imply that they are overpowered by going out of his way to make this.
-
did you read the thesis? he clearly says that he is trying to disprove the notion that both hunter supers are under powered, or inferior, and that striker titans are not overpowered, or superior, based on statistical information alone. most of the focus is on supers, but the other information is also included. also; hunter subclasses are not garbage, they are just less noobish compared to others: least-sticky grenades of all, less 1-hit kill melee (knife can be but it requires aiming; shoulder charge is kind-of lock-on-y as well as warlock smack.).
