{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/28/2015 5:37:22 PM
6
Simple, now I'm definitely not buying TTK. people don't understand "apologize for being a kunt". They understand " apologize or I'm not buying your products"
Money, or a lack there of, talks.
Any that was a pretty douchy thing to say. If he said something against women, he'd already have made a formal apology within the hour. But because he's making fun of trans people, nobody cares. The comments in this thread kinda prove that.
English
-
I am among the few who don't understand where the transgender bias meaning was... At most I see a douchey comment about a person, but not at all based all the fact that they were man who is now a woman. Could you explain your viewpoint?
-
I believe after his comment he linked a picture of the Mona Lisa with a stubbly man's face photoshppped over hers. At first glance his comment lacks context but then you see the picture and now his comment is actually insult. I mean now it's a "joke".
-
I'm still not sure how that was offensive though. For the record, I am not telling anyone what they should or shouldn't do. I don't think the link provided by the op gives enough context for me to be able to make a sound judgement either for or against.
-
He linked that in his comment saying that Caitlyn Jenner let herself go. Idk if people saw that. :/
-
Hmmm, I don't even see a resemblance between the person in the picture and Ms. Jenner. I wouldn't have gotten the joke anyway.
-
There is no resemblance. He's just being an ass hole and using the picture to take make a cheap remark at her transition.
