{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/3/2015 11:03:11 PM
8
-
Even if it directly goes against their religion? Which is protected by the same Law they are obligated to follow?
-
They should read the job description next time.
-
They find a new job. This argument has been used before in the 50's when mixed marriages were allowed. Don't want to abide by the law? Quit your job.
-
So is it fair to force someone into unemployment because they are determined to follow their religion? May I point out that the case about mixed couples aren't based on the Christian's beliefs, this is.
-
The bible was also used then. And she's not abiding by the law. Pretty clear case here.
-
L The Bible was used [i]incorrectly[/i] then. The Bible doesn't condemn mixed couples. The Bible [i]does[/i] condemn homosexuality. [quote]She's not abiding by the law[/quote] You're right and wrong. She's abiding by her religion, which is protected by a document called out U.S. Constitution, which in most cases overrules everything. It says "Freedom of Religion" Now, that means she has the freedom to follow her religion. Her religion condemns homosexuality. So by forcing her to issue licenses and holding her in jail til she does...unconstitutional? You cannot argue that the constitution allows freedom of religion. You cannot argue that she is obeying her religion by not issuing the licenses. You cannot argue that she is in direct disobedience of the Law. So I ask you, is a new Law more powerful that a right given in the constitution?
-
As I said above: WHILE AT WORK SHE IS NOT A PRIVATE CITIZEN; She IS the government
-
[quote]Any public servant is obligated to abide by the law.[/quote]
