No, he's not. Just because he might have existed doesn't mean that he's the son of God.
English
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Edited by LaminarFlow77: 9/7/2015 11:05:25 PMAh just to clear it up a bit. The site itself is christian yes, but the article itself is a collection and summation of other historians (Christian and non-Christian) work. It includes supporting facts from hostile (anti-Christian) sources such as first century Jews and others. A lot easier to link something like that that already has citations and references than type it up on my phone. Peace Edit- oh yeah and assuming things about something you didn't even look at isn't really a good attitude for some one that seeks truth to have.
-
There is proof he has existed
-
Edited by LaminarFlow77: 9/7/2015 5:38:11 PMVirtually no reputable historian questions whether he existed or not. Read the link? Edit- just to be clear I'm not saying his existence (which is pretty well established) is proof of anything, what I'm saying is, and the subject of the article I linked, that rising from the dead proves the claims he made. You want to destroy Christianity? All you have to do is point to Jesus's grave.
-
I'm not gonna waste my time reading some unreputable christian biased website.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Noise you drop links and expect people to read When others drop you links as proof you always ask for you dont listen.
-
Are you stupid? It's a heavily biased, unreputable source. Explain why I should waste my time with that.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Noise as far as im concerned your sources are bias as well ( Ill try and find one and read it or you can drop me one ).
-
What sources, idiot?
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Dont you drop proof to your opinions?
-
Yes, I do. What specific sources are you talking about?
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Proof of Gods unexsistance
-
What? Are you autsitic? What specific link are you talking about that was unreputable or biased?
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Edited by mccwrc09: 9/7/2015 7:27:38 PMIm asking you I havnt seen many links so can you post one or not? And i was only trying to get you to post proof of Gods unexsistance which I presume you have.