{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/8/2015 5:11:23 PM
1
>Says they're not a philosopher
>Began thread on religious philosophies
>kek
English
-
So, if I talk about rockets, does that make me a rocket scientist? Plus, this is about fact, not philosophy.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Edited by JesusOfSuburbia: 9/8/2015 10:22:21 PMIf you talk about rockets as if you are one, then immediately when someone says that's wrong you say "I'm not a rocket scientist", it's just kinda funny. Also, religion is purely philosophical. You know this with the not-trolling side of you.
-
Autism. That's what I just read. My post deals with pure fact. Please stop wasting my time.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Lel you say pure fact but call those who disagree autistic
-
K. I'd love actually debating something with you when you're done being a dumbass for sport.
-
Chill. You're gonna make yourself cry again.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Late, and flat response. Again, when you're done trolling for kicks, you can try again. There's no point to arguing anything when one side is intentionally acting like a retard to piss others off.
-
I'm not a troll idiot. You clearly don't even believe that I'm a troll seeing as how you've been "feeding" me this whole time if I was actually a troll. Fail. Why are you still replying? It just shows how mad you are.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
[quote]I'm not a troll idiot. You clearly don't even believe that I'm a troll seeing as how you've been "feeding" me this whole time if I was actually a troll. Fail. Why are you still replying? It just shows how mad you are.[/quote] *Sigh* fine. Maintain the stupidity. It's not worth my time anymore.
-
Yup, don't even bother to attempt to make a counter-argument. I win, you lose, kiddo. Bye.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
[quote]Yup, don't even bother to attempt to make a counter-argument. I win, you lose, kiddo. Bye.[/quote] [quote]Autism. That's what I just read. My post deals with pure fact. Please stop wasting my time.[/quote] Dumbass.
-
Still here embarrassing yourself with irrelevant things? Boring. Anything interesting you want to do, autist?
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
I'd like to point out you're insufferable and continue to bring more points against yourself than for yourself.
