{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/8/2015 10:29:49 PM
1
K. I'd love actually debating something with you when you're done being a dumbass for sport.
English
-
Chill. You're gonna make yourself cry again.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Late, and flat response. Again, when you're done trolling for kicks, you can try again. There's no point to arguing anything when one side is intentionally acting like a retard to piss others off.
-
I'm not a troll idiot. You clearly don't even believe that I'm a troll seeing as how you've been "feeding" me this whole time if I was actually a troll. Fail. Why are you still replying? It just shows how mad you are.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
[quote]I'm not a troll idiot. You clearly don't even believe that I'm a troll seeing as how you've been "feeding" me this whole time if I was actually a troll. Fail. Why are you still replying? It just shows how mad you are.[/quote] *Sigh* fine. Maintain the stupidity. It's not worth my time anymore.
-
Yup, don't even bother to attempt to make a counter-argument. I win, you lose, kiddo. Bye.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
[quote]Yup, don't even bother to attempt to make a counter-argument. I win, you lose, kiddo. Bye.[/quote] [quote]Autism. That's what I just read. My post deals with pure fact. Please stop wasting my time.[/quote] Dumbass.
-
Still here embarrassing yourself with irrelevant things? Boring. Anything interesting you want to do, autist?
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
I'd like to point out you're insufferable and continue to bring more points against yourself than for yourself.
-
Blah blah blah. I just told you to say something interesting, and there you go boring me again. If I'm so "insufferable", why don't you leave, kid?
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Because I click on notification before I see who they're from, mostly. At that point, may as well egg you on. It's funny when I read you're stuff. You're like the little eight year old that argues with everyone because they can. And then regardless of what happens in the argument, they will act smug for the rest of the day because they won in their head.
-
I'm only continuing here because you're too dumb to realize that you're bumping my post for me, kiddo. Please, continue to say nothing of importance while helping me out. I really appreciate it.
-
Actually modal logic proved Gods existence over 40 years ago. This was proven by Gödel's ontological proofIt has now been tested and proven further with the use of a super computer by two scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_ontological_proof http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
-
Axiom 3 assumes the existence of God, by forcing any model of the logic to feature a god-like entity. The proof therefore assumes god and is vacuous.
-
Edited by JesusOfSuburbia: 9/10/2015 4:21:39 AMPlease. By now, anyone who wants to read your drivel has already seen this and come here. Bumping just keeps it near the top for you. And I'm completely apathetic to that. Also, please note in only saying nothing of relevance because you purposefully derailed this. You still never answered the base question. Answer that and I'll say things of relevance.
-
The base question is pointless and irrelevant. I've already stated that I'm not a philosopher. I'm flattered that you have enough time to continue to bump my posts for me. Out of curiosity, how old are you?
