{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/12/2015 9:17:56 PM
2
Ah. If youre younger than youll learn when youre older. If youre older than..best i can say is try it once or twice to see what people enjoy about it. Besides cant lecture your kids on it if you dont have firsthand experience with it. Imo
English
-
I can lecture kids just fine on the topic of murder, and I don't have to have any first hand experience. This pretty much invalidates that argument.
-
Edited by Thr0ckmorton: 9/12/2015 10:04:50 PMYoure comparing murder to smoking weed. Stupid, even for a 17 year old
-
You totally missed my point. I am assuming that when the previous poster said he will be able to lecture to children at the least, I don't think he was talking about giving them a lecture on how you should smoke marijuana. How is my statement any different? I could use anything. I can lecture people on why they shouldn't crash cars without ever actually being in a car crash. Really, it's quite simple English.
-
Edited by Thr0ckmorton: 9/12/2015 10:25:18 PMAgain, youre relating crashing a car to smoking weed. Simple English yet you cant even read and notice im the OP of the comment. I completely meant that without trying marijuana or alcohol it is ridiculous to lecture your kids on it, pros or cons. You are just being a tool by pointing out things that are completely morally wrong or obvious injurious and trying to compare them to my statement just to be right. Again, stupid, even for a 17 year old
-
My phone wasn't displaying the comments right and it didn't show you to be the OP. In any case, you again have misunderstood my comment. Why do I have to do something to lecture on it?
-
Truth be told
