{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/12/2015 11:13:19 PM
2
Lol, and idiots who can't think for themselves is just pathetic, and fairly amusing.
People who smoke pot are mostly not addicted to it, that's just a fact. You can technically become addicted to anything enjoyable so some people do, but it's very rare. The vast majority of pot smokers are upstanding, contributing members of society who simply smoke in their leisure time just as many people drink, except pot is dramatically less harmful and a lot more fun (no hangovers if you overdo it, and it's a cleaner high).
English
-
Numbers? Statistics? Proof? I'm not flat out saying your wrong, but I think we should have hard evidence of those claims before its legalised, and I don't think that's an unreasonable thing to ask for when it comes to the law.
-
Go do your research if you need statistics, I actually watch documentaries and read things besides anti-drug propaganda, which results in me being informed on such things, and I can't be bothered to be educating every uninformed person on the Internet so do your own research if you want the facts. The truth is out there, you just need to look for it further than watching Fox "News."
-
LMFAO Upstanding used in the same sentence as drugs. LMFAO
-
Ever seen Rick Steve's Europe on PBS? He's as upstanding as they come, and he's a pot smoker. Michael Phelps smokes pot and he's an Olympic Gold Medalist... I could go on but you get my point, namely that you don't know shit.
-
Ah yes, the XYZ people use "insert drug here" therefore it's fine. Of course since I have a different opinion to you I must be an ignorant fool. I urge you to do some real research instead of watching day time documentaries where you have no idea who produced or funded the project. There are no hard statistics on the percentage or pot users to continue to be successful, and most of the evidence they have for OR against legalisation is circumstantial and incomplete.
-
Lol, you're the only one throwing out straw-man arguments here, the statistics are out there even if you're too lazy to go look for them, I've done my job of being an informed citizen and have better things to do than do your research for you. And I hope you feel stupid for being called lazy by a pot smoker, get off your ass and actually look stuff up besides propaganda.
-
I do know what im talking about. You sir, know nothing.
-
Lol, you wish bub, thankfully I know you're a dumbass and not worth my time, so go read a book and watch less Fox News if you want me to take you seriously (and even if you don't watch fox news specifically, I was being flippant and merely mean that you should do some proper research and read something besides propaganda before I do anything besides laugh at the nonsense you have to say).
