Hahaha so you found a couple of links and that proves your point ? You really must be dumb. I'm not saying that to bug you. I really do think you may be dumb. If you really think that posting 5 or 6 links that you searched for proves your point then my friend you really look stupid. Will I post 100 links that show its harmless ??? If I do that will u accept what I'm saying as fact. Because trust me I could go out there with rose tinted glasses on and find 100000 links supporting mj. This is a serious question . If I do that will u accept that it proves my point ???? Remember this is your logic we are using here so be careful how u answer. You could end up looking more stupid and ignorant than u already look. Can't wait to hear your reply to this one
English
-
You are a sad individual. If you don't trust peer reviewed scientific journal articles that have stood the test of scrutiny and time, what [i]do[/i] you trust? Dr Oz? Conspiracy theorists? Random authors in High Times magazine? Sorry for you if you don't have an education in a field of science, but I haven't just posted random links, you goddamned moron. This is rigorous science. Please feel free to do your own research. But everything I posted is legitimate science that backs my claims. Go smoke another joint, it's doing wonders for your IQ
-
I don't smoke it. Point is again I'm sure I can and will find proven scientific studies debunking all that u posted. What you posted are not facts. You posted one side of the argument. Now please do us all a favour and fûck right off
-
I was asked to provide sources and I did. It it you and your ilk who are being extremely closed-minded. I knew providing CREDIBLE SOURCES wouldn't satisfy people dead-set in an agenda. No surprise. Keep on spreading that misinformation, chief! I'll go ahead and mute you now because frankly I'm annoyed with you and trying to cut ignorant people out of my life whenever possible.