{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by redshirt4life:
9/13/2015 2:00:41 AM
1
No, you -blam!-ing don't. Read the damn constitution, jackass.
English
-
First Amendment - Religion and Expression. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. He's right. The first amendment gives him the right to say whatever he pleased. He can say he murdered 500 people if he wants. He can also say if a drug is good or bad in his opinion. Or do we need to make a new amendment for freedom of opinions?
-
Edited by LeGrookster: 9/13/2015 3:15:54 AMThank you! My point exactly.
-
Edited by redshirt4life: 9/13/2015 2:41:31 AMDiscussion of illegal activities in the context of committing crime is against the law. Free speech is relative. It does not grant you permission to infringe on another person's rights.
-
How am I discussing illegal activities? I am simply stating that I support the legalization of Hemp. Therefore, according to your logic, I can say what I have said legally.
