{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Tinker (Chloe):
12/15/2015 6:59:32 PM
12
Thorn in year 2?
The purpose of the poll is simple, to test another player's opinion that all the community wants a year two version of Thorn. This post will be later edited when Data starts to be released by you guys voting, but also feel free to post your own opinion below.
Edit 1: It would seem that at first the poll was very option 1 heavy, but it seems to have changed now to be much more balanced. That is an interesting development.
~ Joshua TCB
-
2 RepliesOk I can see where bungie is coming from by wanting to take old OP exotics out and make us use new ones.. but they are approaching this situation all wrong. I can understand why legendaries don't have a year 2 but these are EXOTICS. They should always be atleast be usable in the newest content. Maybe not the very best like year 1 but atleast still usable. Seriously bungie think about the community. Yes I like thorn. But I love all exotics and the way that some of them are USELESS in the new content is really unfair to the people who like those weapons. And even without the exotics being taken away, people will still explore new weapons - you know why ? Because they are NEW. ( and why nerf galla it's not gonna be usable in year 2 ? Why buff hard light and necro if it's not gonna be usable on year 2 ? Seriously .. exotics are exotics . They are meant to be the best in the game and should always be an option to use. No matter if it's year 1 or 20. Please re consider. Xbox 1 - Aura Voltzz
