{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/24/2015 4:32:59 PM
2
[quote]The numbers that die from war, plauge, genocide, and famine are the same as they would be if they died from old age.
Are these things bad then?[/quote]
Wut???????
According to [i]your[/i] argument, if I shot & killed someone (not that I would, Ninjas - I'm talking hypothetically here!) then that could be argued as not bad because that person would've died from old age, at some time?
If that argument is classed as intelligent, I'm done.
English
-
The end result is the same. Peace saves no one.
-
That's correct, yet peace allows those people to live out their lives until whenever their natural or unfortunate death may be. Just because the end result is the same, doesn't mean that it's okay to tolerate the unnecessary acceleration of pain & suffering.
-
Oh you naive person. You will have war and suffering through the generations if there is not an end born of fire so that revenge and want never raise their heads again.
-
[quote]Oh you naive person. You will have war and suffering through the generations if there is not an end born of fire so that revenge and want never raise their heads again.[/quote] You're missing my point and also seem to be forgetting yours. Your post was based solely on the fact that it is intelligent to suggest that the death of innocents can be argued as okay simply because the end result is the same. Countering that statement does not make me naive and you spouting the above statement (which looks like some quote from Jayden Smith) does not make you - nor your original post - intelligent.
-
My brain
