You assume that based on your presupposition that your argument is flawless.
You accept the bible as correct, so you can't tell the difference between what's supported by archeological data and what has no supporting evidence.
The funny thing is that my presupposition was that there was a God and that the bible was fact. Then I discovered critical thinking and all of that went away.
English
-
Lol, you are talking just like Dawkins in the video. Appeal to your own perceived "intelligence". That's cool.
-
Well apparently you're not willing to continue to have a logical argument, so I guess this has been reduced to a dick measuring contest. I'll have you know that my intellect is at least 3 inches longer than yours.
-
I haven't said one thing about my intelligence.
-
Neither have I, not seriously, anyway. I simply said that it's because of my ability to look beyond my presuppositions that I doubt God.