{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Fenderslasher:
9/29/2015 5:57:56 AM
1
Class distribution is almost 33%, 33%, 33% usage in pvp with a small margin of error. There is no case of there being proof that there were actually more hunters than Titans at any time whatsoever disproving any argument of the sort. It's an even distribution. The shear fact that hunters are making twice as many kills per capita and still calling for nerfs to other classes is absolutely disgraceful. And it's not just the super, it's the melee and the grenades as well. It's better than the other two across the board no matter how you slice it.
Edit: each of the new classes is randomly tracked and is clocking in at roughy 6% of the total population each also proving that it's not a case of Titans and warlocks are still using the old supers and therefor not competing adequately.
English
-
True. I've mostly seen 4-5 hunters in Rumble during y1. It was almost impossible to come out on top because of golden gun back in the day lol Warlocks have a much larger reach with their melee with the stormcaller. But hunters can basically throw theirs wherever they want. Even adding poison or the cloaking ability. They even get an enhanced motion tracker as a perk which makes it even better to predict where the enemy will be. Not to mention, tethering people in supers cancels them. Even while you're in a super and even get near it, it'll tether to you and cancel it. A super that cancels a super and also kills/gives bonus damage is the better super imo. I just love the Warlock to much. haha
