{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Tinjus:
9/28/2015 3:33:09 PM
188
What is considered as "good" in terms of kd ratio?
Just curious, my main crucible character is at a 1.3 kd ratio, would that be considered good? I'm not a regular crucible player, I play it from time to time and generally sit at the top of the board in kill-based game modes such as rumble and clash, I would like to know from regular crucible players, what you guys consider "good" in terms of kd ratio.
Any input would help, good or bad, so I can try improve on my kd a bit more. Im trying to play a bit more crucible nowadays
Thanks for all the comments guys, ive been informed that kd isnt as important in comparison to other stats
-
Edited by Talk2MeToner: 9/29/2015 8:18:24 PMMy philosophy has always been if you're over 1.0 you helped more than you hurt the team. Anything above is good. Some will be ridiculous nerdy try hards and say 2.0 or something PS according to destint tracker the only subclasses over the population to have positive KDs before TTK were both Hunter subclasses. That means that prior to TTK the overall average KD was probably around .9 something
