{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/15/2015 9:08:31 AM
1
Definitely agree with you that weapon diversity was higher in HoW. And man, I miss my weapons too. Fatebringer was my go to primary for PVE and I was uber accustomed to it. But at the same time, I'm enjoying TTK a lot more than HoW. I like that I need to update all my gear; I can see the logic in this direction.
English
-
I just think that TTK would have perfected what HoW [i]wanted[/i] to be, if it had simply included Year 1 in the Infusion system. It would retain the positives from HoW (like gear diversity, and activity relevance), but would remove most of the negative aspects (by nerfing OP gear like Gjally, and making the level cap more respectable). Again, I'm not saying I don't want to use [i]new[/i] weapons, but HoW proved (in my opinion) that players [i]do not[/i] need to be forced to move on in order to experience new content. And, thanks to all the 2.0 patches/nerfs, I think that would be ever MORE true in the TTK Meta, since weapons like Gjally no longer break the system like they did before, if that makes sense. :P Even if Infusing Year 1 gear took 2-3x more effort than Year 2, I still think it'd be worth it, because even if you don't care about the [i]gear[/i], it seems like a massive shame to leave all those [i]activities[/i] behind. XC
