I dont know "these guys" are that you speak of, but, i never said anything about time spent on the warlock nor did i say he wasn't "hackable (which is completely different than a bug or glitch. Do YOU know what programming is Lol)or "breakable" or "glitchable". I mearly corrected you incredibly incorrect statement which, apparently, has gotten you VERY defensive. Until a glitch, exploit or bug is found, the warlock is exploit, glitch and bug free. Also you "decently" comment contradicts the time comment. So you're saying the warlock was done more decently than the other two? Proof? This back and fourth with you is pretty entertaining. Just a fyi.