[quote]Sounds like you need to convince your mom to buy you TTK,[/quote] I think we need a feature for the forum that displays member age. Comments like this get old after a while. [quote]put away your damn Thorn/Fellwinter,[/quote] I have neither. =P [quote]Yeah, there are some things that aren't perfect[/quote] Some? O_o [quote]right now[/quote] So the past year doesn't count because...? [quote]but there has has also been an update every week since TTK launched.[/quote] Its an online game, that's rather expected. [quote]If anything the article shed some light as to why we have been frustrated by highlighting their resource and time constraints[/quote] ...No? They totally trashed Joseph Staten's original work and then this whole "Iron Bar" group of team leads got together and butchered the crap out of it. Activision had nothing to do with that. THAT was the result of incompetent management. Bungie is like the Target of the Gaming Industry now. You've got bosses at the top who make stupid decisions at the cost of quality. Activision didn't help at all and they perpetuated an ongoing problem, but the Iron Bar was flawed and the Blacksmiths didn't have it the tools to properly reforge what had already been crafted. [quote]Lastly, your expectations are out of this world[/quote] [b]The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt[/b] by CD Projekt Red. [b]Dragon Age: Inquisition[/b] by Bioware. [b]Fallout 4[/b] by Bethesda. [b]Halo 5[/b] by 343 Industries. [b]Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain[/b] by Kojima Productions. [b]Mabinogi[/b] by devCAT. [b]TERA Online[/b] by Bluehole Studio. [b]ARK: Survival Evolved[/b] by Studio Wildcard The list goes on and on. My expectations are quite real and acceptable for any AAA Game.

Witcher 3 was one of the reason why I didnt play destiny in the first half of this year (ignoring the fact that TDB and HOW content were already on the disc and I'm not spending this much money for some poor dlcs) But my point here is that if you look at the witcher 3 dlc management you can see how much dicks bungie's throwing at your face to suck. Witcher 3 was a huge game. Actually I think I might start playing it again since I dont feel like I can do much things in destiny. Only waiting for the raid every week. Compared to other rpg-like games this is bullshit. Nothing to do after 2 weeks of gaming except a few hours per week for doing the raid with every character wont hold me to this game much longer. PvP isnt an option either unless you are playing sunbreaker (or maybe nightstalker) and for secondaries most of the people using pumpgun or maybe sniper. There is no real variation in pvp either. So a few weeks after release destiny is a monotonous timeburner again.

The Game of the Year edition for Dragon Age: Inquisition is out now. If you haven't checked it out yet, you should totally grab a copy. Comes with literally all the DLC for the game which makes it that much bigger. Plus, Bioware is an amazing developer. Looking forward to the new Mass Effect game.

If you were to play every mission in destiny from start to finish i would estimate it would be about 20 hours. 30 if you add in all raids and poe. Cost? 140 dollars [b]Witcher 3?[/b] 200 hours without repeating a single mission. Speed run? 25 hours. Cost? 60 bucks. Bonus? 16 free dlc add ons, thank you letter to the fans from the studio, and told the fans if you are unsure about the expansion [i]don't buy it. Wait and read the reviews.[/i] Maaaaaan, if they made a online shared world i would be in heaven.

I especially liked how they announced the expansion months before hand, and gave a rough completion time. And when it was released it went with a proper exchange rate AND the option to order the cards from the 'physical' version if you had already bought the season pass. Hopefully the next expansion will have the other two decks.

You mean they didn't just throw a different currency symbol in front of a number for the whole world??? Lol

The current hype surrounding Cyberpunk is very positive. Bigger world than Witcher 3 by a fair margin.