I cringe every time someone uses this argument. Look I see the point and yeah I got some value from the 100$ I spent on Destiny. But compare that to Skyrim which I have easily spent 2-3 times the amount of hours playing that 100$ has way more value. And in the end I can turn that game on 20 years from now and still play it and at some point that won't be the case with Destiny cause the servers will be turned off and the game is done. Perhaps someone may find a way to create their own server at that point, but for the vast majority of players the game will be useless. Now all I really have to say is the Legend of Zelda for the NES. You want to argue value $40 that is still going strong after 30 years. And I still play every year. I wouldn't even want to try and guess the hours I have put into that game in my 33 years of gaming. It's really not a solid argument if your going to talk value for a game with a very limited life span.