{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/10/2015 10:06:48 AM
1
I guess you to busy being stupid, that skyrim had almost the same graphics and still was one of the best games
English
-
Edited by The Cryptard: 11/10/2015 10:14:17 AMSkyrim came out 4 years ago. I paid for a console that was supposed to open new horizons for gaming. So go back to your cave before you try to insult people. If you're okay with the quality of the graphics that's fine, i expressed my opinion. I don't think it's to the quality it should be. Oh, and learn to spell and make complete sentences that make sense before you insult people's intelligence.
-
Well if you paid for a console that wanted to do that then maybe you should have researched it first. Xbox one hardware is even good enough to run fallout at 60 fps.
-
I own a PC, PS4, and Xbox ONE. Frame rate doesn't dictate how good fallouts graphics are if they aren't made to allow it. The game looks like a last gen game. It's really expansive terrain does limit the graphics, but it's not that huge. It's just subpar on graphics. No way around it.
-
You do know that graphics don't make the game right? There have been several games with crap graphics and still won goty. Yes graphics are nice to have but game play is better to have.
-
I in fact did know that and never once attacked the quality of anything other than the graphics.. I don't know why people put words in my mouth so to say. I just stated the graphics were less than what I hoped for. They are, and most everyone agrees that it's not on the forefront of gaming graphics.
