{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/3/2015 4:11:53 AM
1
Never said they would be called differently. I don't see why there are less females than males in battle, at least in the higher ranks, unless there wasn't sexism.
English
-
*facepalms* tell me again how many high ranking members of houses we have fought. Go on. List them. Im waiting
-
Approximately 15 on my Grimoir. That's a lot, considering (I didn't include servitors) that these are Barons, Kells or Archons. Extremely high ranking officers, in other words. I have seen one of them be female. Why is that without sexism then? Remember, these are spread out amongst multiple houses.
-
Pirsis. Female Eramis ship stealer baroness from devils. Female drevis baroness of wolves. So give me that count again?
-
That is still an astonishing 13 other male officers. That is a very little amount of female officers.
-
And we have seen all the house forces? All of it? Every single generel? I domt think so...
-
With our current data, this is the closest we can come. This many houses suggest that there is sexism in at least a few houses, if not the majority.
