{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/30/2015 2:24:28 AM
20
So California is doing something about guns kinda..
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://dailycaller.com/2015/12/29/california-gun-law-will-let-police-confiscate-legally-owned-weapons/&ved=0ahUKEwjJwdHAw4LKAhVCez4KHf_qDZYQFggtMAM&usg=AFQjCNEFenoA9V7wFRtUUKRwqXdOFcDu9w&sig2=4mXowyVQUO8do6VUDq-TnA
Sorry for the really long URL. But anyways. Thoughts?
-
1 ReplyI'm just waiting for that cess pit of a state to fall into the ocean.
-
1 Reply...Meanwhile in Texas those who have a gun license, open carry will now be legal on January 1
-
#blessup
-
In all honesty, as long as they only take them away from potential psychos, and not just everybody, it will be okay with me.
-
Oh, so now if somebody is shooting up the place, the police can confiscate their weapon? Great! Sounds like it'll work great! #obvioussarcasmisobvious
-
2 RepliesKeep in mind that The Daily Caller is a conservative rag.
-
3 RepliesSo if people talk about shooting someone / themselves the police have the right to take away their firearms? Well, that's just [i]absurd[/i].
-
It's the in the constitution We have the right bare arms! As long as it's in self defense they have no right to take away our guns
-
1 ReplySenator Feinstein at work, I presume?
-
1 ReplyThis country is run by psychopaths
-
3 RepliesThat's illegal.
-
2 RepliesJust another day in Commiefornia, everybody.
-
5 RepliesA violation of pretty much the entire bill of rights. If anyone supports this by extension you support a suspension of all Miranda rights.
-
2 RepliesAB1014: [quote]This bill would authorize a court to issue a temporary emergency gun violence restraining order if a law enforcement officer asserts and a judicial officer finds that there is reasonable cause to believe that the subject of the petition poses an immediate and present danger of causing personal injury to himself, herself, or another by having in his or her custody or control, owning, purchasing, possessing, or receiving a firearm and that the order is necessary to prevent personal injury to himself, herself, or another, as specified.[/quote] I don't see the problem here. If someone indicates they are going to do harm with a firearm, it should be removed from their possession.
-
I love California❤️great place to live
-
RIP Black people
-
2 RepliesSounds illeagal
-
Kalifornia
-
1 ReplyThe only thing I have a problem with is that you'd have no idea the order was against you. You deserve to know when people place restraints like that on you.
