[url]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/01/11/mark-zuckerberg-angers-anti-vaxxers-with-photo-of-baby-at-doctors-office-getting-vaccinations/[/url]
[quote]It is of course another milestone, complete with an “aww”-inducing photo of Max. But this one set the Internet aflame in a way a gingerbread house never could, because this post is not really about Max at all — many see it as her billionaire father showing his hand in the vaccine debate.
Many of Zuckerberg’s 47 million-some followers saw the post as a not-so-subtle expression of support for vaccinations, the public health matter at the center of an ongoing debate on modern science and civil liberties.
“Thanks for protecting your child, and other children who can’t be vaccinated, and for supporting science!” wrote user Allison Hagood. “Adorable baby.”
(A major element of vaccine advocacy is “herd immunity,” which protects an entire community, including those who are not immune, when a critical portion of the population has been immunized.)
Another user, Elsa Sakz, countered: “Vaccine is poison for human kind. It kills more people than it helps. I wish people don’t take it as an example here.”[/quote]
Thoughts, Flood?
Try to stay civil, please.
-
Edited by HarlesinCharge0: 1/13/2016 6:26:09 AMEdit: I probably should have put a little more thought to writing this so let me explain. I do believe vaccines work the way they say they do. There's enough honest smart doctors who can prove that. That's fine. However we can't prove that they don't cause autism either because a, the way it causes autism hasn't yet been found or b, doctors just view it as a necessary risk and tell people it's better overall and just ignore it.