Like how you completely try to go around what I said. I said the hypocrisy of you expecting men to change but, women are completely fine. And targeting.... you went way off course I responded to your comment based on I disagreed with your statement. That is striking a conversation/debate which two civilized people can have(not an intent of insulting). You tried to target me directly by stating if I didn't agree I must be this. If my perspective is so unoriginal and has no substance, please do enlighten me as of why you completely avoided a logically debate and resorted to criticism.
Yes, good day I hope whatever you want to happen unravels for you without effort.
English
-
Can you show me a place I said women are completely fine? What I've said is that people on the receiving end of poor behavior shouldn't be blamed for the poor treatment they received. In this context, we're referring to your comment that "men and boys will be boys", which sets up the men's behavior as a focus. You want to accuse me of hypocrisy over something I didn't actually say and dismiss what I did say; that the boys will be boys argument is insulting to both men and women except not really according to you because hormones. That's pretty unoriginal and without substance, and I'm not sure why I owe you any debate at all.