Is it not safe to assume you like a gun when you come to a post about it and reply defending it and try to downtalk my skill? How is it stupid to say that? say you engage in a gunfight and you try to strafe in and out of cover the mida user can afford to keep prefiring shots at the opening while you have to value your shots and strafe the cover. Thats what I mean when I say no penalty for missed shots. Thats my whole arguement most guns don't have a big enough clip to not suffer from missed shots. But mida doesn't suffer because the clip is big enough to get 5 kills. hahaha I look like a fool? For what providing valid reasons to balance a weapon i think is a little too good and asking for people to provide healthy debate? isn't that the whole point of the forums especially when it comes to competitive talk. The fact is mida is probably the best year 2 primary in 90% of situations. I do agree the thing is too easy to hit shots with and 90% aim aissit is nuts. Hopefully in the future you can simply provide some arguements against specific points if you disagree with someone elses post instead of trying to dismiss the whole idea and not provide any real debate.