{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/9/2016 10:42:50 PM
1
"Destroy" lol. The super just wouldn't last for ages and the grenades wouldn't make me leave for inactivity trying to regen.
[spoiler]those were exaggerations in case you try to call me on it. The were jokes to emphasise my point.[/spoiler]
English
-
He said, nerf warlock grenades and melee... did you know that our super is based off of our grenades and melee? You nerf our nades and or melee, we no longer have a worthwhile super.
-
The melee is pretty good on warlocks so that would be OK. You only have one super for melee and nades. Plus the burn changes that he is thinking of only effect one nade and only the perks that make it so good.
-
Stickies are meh... the AOE one is terrible. Remember, he said nerf melee, so no, it wouldnt be good anymore. Firebolts were already nerfed once, let them be.
-
Fire bolts were "nerfed" but actually got stronger if you read the patch notes.
-
I did read the patch notes. In no way did they get buffed. Their initial dmg was brought down with arcbolt.
-
Yes but Viking funeral is the problem. It was supposed to be nerfed but it was not.
-
In no way was it supposed to be nerfed. It was just the whiners who wanted it to be. Firebolt was nerfed though.
