{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/12/2016 5:12:11 PM
1
It's easy for someone who is not the CEO of a company like Activision to say "just drop them" when that CEO stands to leave 10's of millions of dollars on the table by "just dropping them." If the financial potential is there, and it is, you would be an idiot to leave that much money behind. There can very viably be 2 versions of the game, 1 for old gen & 1 for new gen. NBA2K, Black Ops 3, and Diablo 3 are all currently doing it, just to name a few.
English
-
Edited by Angelus Reprobi: 2/12/2016 6:57:58 PMThe cost of production will out way the sales in old Gen. It's done time to move on this why there will be no more updates for the 360. By the time the next games out you could save up for one since prices drop and more used systems become available. It's pointless to make 2 games like that if this was 2 years ago maybe but not now move on to the system that can run a better game. Diablo 3 is from 2012 and black ops 3 is so cut down on old Gen it's a waste to play. They won't lose money dropping old Gen they'll gain more by producing a better quality game and not waste resources from splitting development. Your wording and constant use of idiot leads me to infer that you're driven by emotion on your opinion because you're still on old Gen which is no way an objective way to look at things.
