[quote]You're fućking retarded aren't you ? People are still allowed to use Icebreaker, Invective, and Sidearms in order to get around the lack of special ammo. The only difference is that the person trying to do this has to die and then switch weapons. And I really, really hope you're not calling me new because I've been playing since the Beta.[/quote] Oh watch out! We got a beta player over here! And?

Just because it's been a thing for a while doesn't mean it isn't going to be fixed. Especially when they implemented the special ammo changes. Yeah I saw this coming, I'm not a dumbass. It's going to get fixed, fućking bet on it. If it's as bad as what the forums are making it out to be, and other sources, it's going to get changed because it is a loophole around the mechanics they've tried to implement. Stop defending it dude, you're making yourself look dumb as hell.

Your assumptions are making you look dumb as hell. I'm not defending it. I could honestly not give any less of a shit what people in Destiny pvp are doing, especially when it comes to you being killed by a 1000 yard stare with "fake" ammo in it. My honest thoughts all along have been to make snipers a primary weapon, like they actually are everywhere else. It will stop people from body shotting with a sniper and finishing with tlw or the other way around. I'm just surprised that people cry a such as they do about [i]everything[/i], considering every weapon type has been basically run into the ground because people can't use them properly. People have been sniping in this game for as long as I can remember, and the only way I foresee to change this situation is to lose special everytime you die, which is basically broken like heavy ammo used to be. Even still, there will be those who will use ib still just for its regen ability and that reason only.

Make to where in pvp (ONLY), switching ammo even during deaths makes your ammo count go to zero. Bam, problem solved. I am not asking for specific weapon nerfs, this has literally nothing to do with that. This is about the switching of a weapon during a certain time in order to have ammo in the preffered weapon. If people instead just used IB, Invective, or Sidearms and didn't use them to switch out ammo, totally cool with that. Don't give a shit about the specific weapon itself. This is the exploiting of a weapon's perk in order to get around a mechanic.

I know what it's about. I mean I am a chemical engineer and I did take an English class or two, along with developing reading skills to interpret symbols jumbled together as a written language. Honestly, they will fix it, probably. If they do, then Bungo is literally the [i]dumbest[/i] corporation to exist, second to Enron. They already answered the cries of the crucible several times by rebalancing weapons here and there, nerf this and that and dropping otherwose excellent perks from weapons and armor because crucible babies [i]cried about it[/i]. What they need to do is disable trials, iron banana and all of these stupid "special" events and actually put some additional content in the game, not worry about some loophole that's making everyone turn into Polly Pissy Pants dolls. No matter what they do to crucible, people will cry and whine about it. These same fools took and [i]excellent[/i] Y1 weapon (mythoclast) and turned it into fruitcake that can't shoot straight. Then "accidentally" nerfed and buffed it like 5 more times because they forgot it existed. I'm not saying you are wrong, or that the loophole is right. I'm just saying they have known for almost a year that it works like it does and haven't cared the slightest bit and still implemented changes. *sidenote: It still takes like 30 seconds to regen that ammo, so just rush a little harder.

Alright, so in other words you're just a pve biased player. I hate to tell you, but there are pvp players in Destiny. You're bringing up weapon nerfs when what I suggested, had nothing to do with a specific weapon nerf. Not to mention is said pvp only. Hope you read that. I'm just gonna go ahead and leave this be because this looks like it's trying to turn into a conversation about something that has nothing to do with this specific topic.