{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/15/2016 8:20:57 PM
4
Honestly any weapon that varies it's damage based off of luck is simply idiotic. Since everyone seems to say they liked the feel of the base gun pre nerfs I'd be fine with seeing that gun come back with different, non luck based perks. But as is I am glad this gun is useless at the moment. There is nothing more frustrating than knowing that the reason you got killed was because of bad luck than because you got outplayed in my opinion.
English
-
Luck in the chamber was a nice perk but not reliable. If you even had a few pixels exposed I would 2 shot you on the spot. The real power of the hawk was came from precision damage.
-
Well you can't two shot without the luck in the chamber or the holding aces activating, you would have to three shot (two to the head one to the body). I am perfectly fine with a gun that can do that since the RoF feels about right for that, or even a much slower firing gun that can two shot headshot. What I am not okay with is a balanced three shot gun (which is what hawkmoon was before) being able to randomly give you a two shot headshot kill. I liked the feel of the hawkmoon, I just don't want to see it make a comeback unless it has different perks.
-
Luck? What are you talking about? It's random, not luck.
-
I hope that was sarcasm.
