Sure, because that last sentence was meant to be very serious.
I'd be with you about the Icebreaker switching exploit by the way. But as you decided to articulate this in a very primitive way I'm not with you on this thread.
English
-
Edited by TheOneSandman: 2/17/2016 7:01:39 PM@pink anarchist Exactly what I was thinking. I can sympathize with the fact that using secondary weapons that generate ammo to fuel other weapons might not adhere to the intention behind the latest patch removing special ammo from the start of the match. The problem is that the OP sounds like such a giant whiny douche when crying about it. I guess I almost agree in principle, but not in practice or application. It is very difficult for me to agree whole heartedly with anyone who sounds like they have just thrown their toys out of the pram.