{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/19/2016 8:14:23 PM
1
In the Division, at least I'm allowed an opportunity to play the game. That's more than what can be said for Destiny and it's lack of MM.
What you're saying is that it's better to not play Destiny than it is to play it at less than absolutely ideal circumstances? If that's the case, then maybe Destiny already lost to the Division. It certainly is by current player count. That's for sure.
English
-
Edited by Evilless001: 3/19/2016 11:31:11 PMNothing is inhibiting you from playing all of Destiny. If you choose not to put the effort in to find a group that's on you. Ideal is an understatement, playing a raid with auto joined randoms would be the worst ingame experience ever. The Division came out a week ago lol, I'd hope its player base would be higher. Keep in mind it hasn't hit anywhere near Destiny at its peak and I doubt it ever will. Casuals don't stick to one game very long, which is what the division is at the moment, even more so than Destiny.
-
Should I have to program MM into the game myself and add in all the bug fixes for Destiny if those show up as well? A game that requires multiple people online in order to play should have a system that helps players find these other players. Destiny does not and that's a failure on the game. I'm surprised this game isn't asking me to type in IP addresses while it's at it. It already surpassed Destiny at it's peak. Look at any numbers, not to mention launch sales were already higher too. Those are just facts you're going to have to live with.
-
Lol if you say so.
-
The numbers do, I'm just reading them aloud. ;)
