{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Lost Sols:
3/21/2016 4:39:18 PM
131
Question for people opposed to OPTIONAL matchmaking
If you go for a drive, you could get in an accident.
If you use a stove, you could get burned.
If you play sports, you could get hurt and opponents could cheat.
If you swim, you could drown.
If you fly, you could crash.
If you walk, you could trip and fall.
If you explore, you could get lost.
If you go out in the cold and snow, you could get frostbite.
If you go out to eat, you could get food poisoning.
If you park your car, someone could ding it.
If you go to the beach, you could get sunburned.
If you talk to people in public, they could be mean to you.
If you go out in a storm, you could get struck by lightning.
If you go to a movie, it could suck.
If you love, you could have your heart broken.
So what I want to know is, if we shouldn't be allowed to have[b] optional[/b] matchmaking because our teammates might suck, be mean, not try or quit...
Why the -blam!- should we be allowed to leave our beds and risk all the millions of bad things that could happen out in the world?
Maybe the government should make laws to prevent us from doing all the things above so we never experience anything bad. Maybe we just shouldn't be born to begin with.
Now post some bullshit how it's somehow not the same.
https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/129939506/0/0
-
Edited by KelRiever: 3/22/2016 5:52:00 PMTo understand the argument against optional matchmaking, you must understand the mentality of blind faith fanbois: 1. First accept everything Bungie does as holy and great 2. Take everything Bungie says and let it wash the brain, so that it gets said by the fanboi like it is their own idea 3. Since the assumption is everything Bungie does is right and true like a religion, make up every excuse you can think of like it's a real reason, and not just the stubborn, misguided company (because this is impossible, in the cult of fanboism). 4. The fanboi blames the person they are arguing with, as if they are the problem. Usual reasons are: critic played the game too little or doesn't have it/bought the game or played so many hours so they must love it anyway. Also, 'negavitiy', because if something is bad, obviously the critic is going to be negative about it. Sound right?
