Malok and Alak-hul. Both seeked to take the throne of the Hive. Both felled by our hand.
Because of their relation I feel compelled to compare them, and Malok doesn't seem anywhere near as powerful or threatening as Alak-hul. Malok has more magic on his side rather than just having a big axe, but he doesn't really feel as dangerous as Alak-hul. Maybe it's just the setting. Malok hides behind his adds most of the time and you can also hide from him easily. Alak-hul on the other hand can just appear behind you at any time and stomp your head in.
What do you think about it? It's a lot more reasonable of a comparison than asking if Atheon can give Crota a wedgie.
-
Alak-hul is just a knight who's a bit stronger by the sword logic (slewing legions of hive for his girlfriend... How do they breed anyway? Never mind I don't wanna know) He's capable in a one on one fight sure, I suppose. However malok has secrets given to him by Savathun and Oryx. And when he gained his new shape (became taken), oryx allowed him to keep some of his own will so he could then be capable of utilizing lesser taken in battle. Alak-hul would be alone, whilst malok could use strategics to his advantage and shadow touch him, so there would be no way for darkblade to charge him Malok wins