{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Scrub:
8/19/2016 8:16:42 AM
1
The point is, you want Activision to change a contract so you can get items.
My point is, its illegal for Activision to do it...its a contract.
English
-
That's not my point at all, my point is a company that doesn't make a game shouldn't have so much leverage on how much and when exclusive content should be released more so than the company that makes it, but the main point in trying to make is that timed exclusives shouldn't exist, Sony only did it to give people incentive to buy their console, although it's a smart move from a business standpoint, it divides gamers and gives the impression that they don't actually care about the gaming industry but more about their sales figures, there are other ways to give consumers incentive to buy your product other than paying to lock other people out of the content you get
-
[quote]It's can't be broken but it can be renegotiated[/quote] So what was this about again? It was about the contract, you said it, get real dude.
-
Yes that was my initial comment, it doesn't mean my entire point is based on it
-
Lol. Not a single legit reply, just "Thats not what im talking about but yea, its what i said" Denial.
