Seen it on here done numerous times in one single thread.
-When we talk about the terror these radical muslims are causing we are talking about the present, not the past. The crusades are completely irrelevent to what is going on now. Meanwhile Muslims are committing suicide bombings, beheadings, etc etc every single day across the globe. These things are a problem NOW, they are not events from the past like the cursades
-When you bring up how the Quran has over 100 verses in it encouraging Muslims to committ violent acts against non believers these apologists ALWAYS reply "Yeah well the bible blah blah". Can they not see that Christians arent out there committing acts of violence anymore than the average human being and obviously no where near the level of Muslims?
Also the irony in their rebuttal to the first point is that the Crusades were retaliation against the Muslims for prior invasions muslims did on christian lands but thats probably too much for these SJWs to digest
We have got to do something about our liberal problems
EDIT: We arent Trending! Keep it up guys
-
Because the extremists do too. The Crusades were a goofed up time in which Christians were radicalized to kill people who did not think like them. The "apologists" bring it up to remind people that at one point the Muslims were on the receiving end of this, but on a much larger scale. Yet this was solved, not by wiping out every Christian on the face of the Earth, but by Christians discovering for themselves what Christ commanded of His followers. "Apologists" bring up the Crusades to remind people that the Abrahamic religions go through sometimes violent evolutions. In the end, there will be peace, but peace cannot be achieved by wiping Muslims out.