{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Auttumnnnn:
9/18/2016 8:07:53 AM
27
Your Opinion on the "Fallout" Series
How do you feel about the series as a whole? How do you feel about individual titles within the series?
-
It's k
-
I've played Fallout 3 through 4. I'm a big fan.
-
3 Replies1. Good 2. Brilliant 3. Brilliant NV. Overrated 4. Average
-
I like the series as a whole. A little too "M-rated" for me though.. Too much gore & sexual talk. But the fact that something woth both of those things has hooked me is saying something, as one or the other--especially both--usually turns me away. And, while I do like the series as a whole, the RPG mechanics in 4 were too dumbed down, and I despise the most recent installment with a passion.
-
Edited by Guiro97: 9/19/2016 12:28:19 AM1. Good 2. Great 3. Good NV. Great 4. Average Shelter. Good for what it is (it's free who cares) Didn't play Tactics or BoS. Edit: other than that, the lore is some of the best in gaming and media in general. The best part of the series for me is always the unmarked areas/quests/info etc. It makes the games just feel that more vibrant and real.
-
I tried to play 4 but I found it bland and boring.
-
Edited by ObamaBinLaden: 9/18/2016 10:52:59 PMseries as a whole is great, but fallout 4/10 is probably my least favorite game of all time. what a disappointment.
-
Played a bit of 3. A decnent amount of 4. It just seems boring to me honestly. Then again I'm not much for singleplayer games. The only one I love to play is Assassin's Creed.
-
I've played 3 and 4. I'm not fan.
-
They are pretty much Elder Scrolls games but with better combat, excluding the first two of course. I don't much care for the post apocalyptic world though, it's not as pretty as the fantasy world of ES.
-
How did his get disliked? Anyway, its not a bad series. Came a long way. The Vaults are an interesting concept.
-
Slow Clunky Ugly
-
Slow, clunky, glitch ridden
-
I prefer Wasteland
-
Series is great as a whole. With a large amount of lore behind it for those who enjoy that kinda thing, like myself. Same goes to Elder Scrolls.
-
Only played 3, NV, and 4. Series is alright.
-
I loved Fallout 3, and New Vegas was my all time favorite. Never had a chance to play the original Fallout games before Bethesda. Fallout 4 was alright, but I think what kept me going back was actually living in the same state, and actually seeing some of the things that were in the game. Truthfully, I just want Obsidian to be handed the Fallout 4 engine, so we could see what they'd put out. Not necessarily a New Vegas 2, just any new Obsidian Fallout game.
-
Preferred it when Black Isle / obsidian handled it Why I enjoyed WL2 more than FO4
-
None of them will ever be as good as fallout NV to me. That's just a perfect game in my opinion.
-
It gets pretty boring after 700 hours in.
-
Overrated
-
I'm a whore for fallout.
-
I enjoyed 1-2 but not as much as Tactics which in my opinion would be the second best Fallout game. Fallout 3 sucked for me because I was a PlayStation user, crashes left right and centre, terrible story, alright DLCs and boring gameplay. Fallout NV suffered from the boring gameplay as well but had a much better story, better DLCs (yes, even dead money was pretty good) and a more interesting world in general. NV is my favourite Fallout. FO4 sucked dick.
-
I hate the gameplay for 1&2, at least early game. The story was alright. 3... I hated the city, the awful maze of shitty buildings and mutants everywhere. The D.L.C was spectacular, Mothership Zeta is the shit. The story was meh, and as if by a blessing, [b][i][u]SUPER SKIPPABLE.[/u][/i][/b] in multiple different ways. Liberty Prime was dope. Pretty nifty perks and skills worked well. I disliked the karma-companion relationship, even though I usually always had perfect karma. New Vegas was my favorite by far. The story was pretty good to me. I enjoyed ruling New Vegas. The perks were well thought out, and I dug the skill checks. Karma didn't mean much and I loved it. The reputation gig was what I really loved. The D.L.C's were all interrelated and fleshed out. Dead Money sucked but the others were perfect. Genocidal Toaster? Guy who was lit ablaze and thrown into a canyon, but still walks the earth, and a Mormon no less? Ulysses?? THAT RANGER ARMOR?????? I didn't mind the gameplay, i used to be all vats, but recently I've gotten the hang of A.D.S 4 was a pretty good game. It's essentially 3 to me, but reversed story wise (father-son, and son-father). The gameplay was the best. The pew pews were fantastic. The interactions were tremendously dumbed down which was meh. I cared a lot more before, but it's kind of faded now. The D.L.C's were....honestly pretty bad. I loved the mechanist, despite it being too short. Far Harbor was neat, but I wasn't really interested in much outside of the detective vault. Nuka world just didn't hold me for a few hours. When I heard there was no real endgame to it, I just kind of fizzled. The game is still better than three, but that's because they're like the same game. This one just has upgraded pew pews and graphics.
-
Have never played 1 and 2. I have the platinum trophy for 3, NV and 4. If these games got no bugs (Fallout 4 1.10 is pretty much flawless now) I would rate the 3 of them 10/10. Never played any dlc btw, I think about getting the season passes on eventual sale.
-
I've never played the 1st or 2nd, but I'm not into turn-based strategy, so I wouldn't enjoy them that much I reckon. I've played 3 and New Vegas, I hated the gunplay so much. I was kinda forced to use V.A.T.S, which I didn't want to use. I appreciate the RPG mechanics though. Fallout 4 was fun, good gunplay and all, but if they kept the RPG mechanics from 3 or New Vegas, it would've been so much better I reckon. I also didn't like the voiced protagonist idea too much. I did enjoy the crafting though. Before this becomes too much of a mess I am going to end it here.
