I hate the gameplay for 1&2, at least early game. The story was alright. 3... I hated the city, the awful maze of shitty buildings and mutants everywhere. The D.L.C was spectacular, Mothership Zeta is the shit. The story was meh, and as if by a blessing, [b][i][u]SUPER SKIPPABLE.[/u][/i][/b] in multiple different ways. Liberty Prime was dope. Pretty nifty perks and skills worked well. I disliked the karma-companion relationship, even though I usually always had perfect karma. New Vegas was my favorite by far. The story was pretty good to me. I enjoyed ruling New Vegas. The perks were well thought out, and I dug the skill checks. Karma didn't mean much and I loved it. The reputation gig was what I really loved. The D.L.C's were all interrelated and fleshed out. Dead Money sucked but the others were perfect. Genocidal Toaster? Guy who was lit ablaze and thrown into a canyon, but still walks the earth, and a Mormon no less? Ulysses?? THAT RANGER ARMOR?????? I didn't mind the gameplay, i used to be all vats, but recently I've gotten the hang of A.D.S 4 was a pretty good game. It's essentially 3 to me, but reversed story wise (father-son, and son-father). The gameplay was the best. The pew pews were fantastic. The interactions were tremendously dumbed down which was meh. I cared a lot more before, but it's kind of faded now. The D.L.C's were....honestly pretty bad. I loved the mechanist, despite it being too short. Far Harbor was neat, but I wasn't really interested in much outside of the detective vault. Nuka world just didn't hold me for a few hours. When I heard there was no real endgame to it, I just kind of fizzled. The game is still better than three, but that's because they're like the same game. This one just has upgraded pew pews and graphics.