I wouldn't call it an obfuscation, nor would I call my diction overly complex. The longest word in my post is "encompasses." Like, really? Are you insinuating that this is overly esoteric? Words like "depravity," "regressive," "schism," "encompass," "substantiate," "reflection," or pretty much any other term I've used that may have lead you to think that I was attempting to deceive through obfuscation, are not very complex. In fact, words like these are essential in effectively communicating the intentions behind a given discourse, as they can elaborate these intentions in a concise manner. My vocabulary is nothing special. Your criticism of my word usage is erroneous, or at least, may be a result of an insufficient vocabulary.