{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/4/2016 1:19:46 PM
1
1. We talked about unnerfing the weapon.
2. It's still possible to snipe enemies from safe spots in every strike.
3. It's way better than the Spindle for Adds. Spindle is just better for Bosses.
4. Icebreaker is still awesome, just not infusable what makes it pretty much obsolete. A Y3 version changes that.
5. Use what you want, no one cares.
English
-
I'm sorry, but explain to me exactly why would you use icebreaker just for adds? It doesn't out DPS anything and add control can be dealt with primaries. It was helpful for CE pit encounter if you didn't have fatebringer, but I can't imagine using it for adds. Also, they said they were going to unnerf it or did they say there were going to make changes?
-
Edited by TeddyBundy: 12/4/2016 1:32:59 PMDude, the other guy said they maybe going to unnerf it and you asked why someone would use it even when it's unnerfed. That's what I'm referring to. If it's unnerfed, it's an awesome weapon for any hard mission or strike. Even with the nerfs a Y3 version would be awesome. Period. If you think otherwise, don't use it. Period. I used Icebreaker religiously in Y1 in strikes or VoG because it was an awesome weapon dealing with adds from safe distances without having any trouble with ammo or dying.
-
Lol k
