{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by KazunK3k:
1/17/2017 12:48:28 PM
1
True, that is one thing I've disagreed with. Having a leader that would lead for a set amount of time, no more than that, with a variety of council chambers and senate committees to make decisions (basically similar to the U.S. government) would be better, and more trustworthy to not be corrupt.
English
-
Maybe, although that leads to the possibility of things not getting done as well. In my opinion a single ruler would be good, but they need to be voted there and also obey a set standard of rules. If they break these rules they have a chance to argue their reason why in front of a select group of highly respected community members. And any abuse of force will be met with the guardians taking them out of power.
-
That actually could be good too. I like it.
