So I've seen a lot of anger directed towards Fallout 4. And not just people saying there are some problems with it but saying stuff saying it's just a call of duty game (which is ridiculous. any unbiased person who played any cod game and fallout 4 would see they are massively different in nearly everyway).
I'll admit that it has its issues and many of them,but come on people!If you hated Fallout 4 you don't know how to play a game and enjoy it properly. Ive had plenty of fun out of games were way more flawed than Fallout 4. Can't we just criticize it without condemning it?
If any body wants we can chat about the game and future installments.
-
Edited by God of Clyde: 1/30/2017 3:47:46 PMHere is my issue, and it seems like it has been happening to all games across the board, or atleast the triple A games. They are being made for the casual gamer. Weapon durability is too much to think about for some people, and that is okay, but to remove it entirely from a game series that incorporated it heavily, that is just disrespectful to us the gamers. It also has no depth to it. Sure there is a massive amount of content, but it doesn't really matter. It is just shoot stuff in a building or in a tunnel or in a vault. There is no leasrning curve, or atleast not a big one, and it just gets boring after a while. Plus with no level cap, that means there is no reason to play through it again. That is all it is now. Plus the fact that it simply does not put roleplaying aspects first, it puts the shooter aspects first.