{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by THUNDERCHILD:
5/18/2017 7:34:54 PM
19
4vs4 crucible only? What a huge step backward. What do these people have against big team battle? Its 2017, we're playing on next gen consoles and pcs, no excuses.
English
-
Agreed. This is a step backwards. It will be a barrier to entry for new crucible players. 4 man fire teams vs. random squad (or even 2 man team and 2 randoms) will be disheartening to a lot of the less skilled players. 6 vs. 6 at least gave newer/less skilled players a chance to be involved, but not completely depended on to win or at least keep the game competitive. I bet we see 6s back before all is said and done. Just a guess. I honestly would love 4s, 6s, 10s and maybe a 30 vs. 30 games modes. Variety!!!!
-
30 v 30 in destiny? lol Even rumble lags
-
Agree , 4x4 in 2017 is a joke . What happened to hybrid FPS / MMO . I played bigger games on PS2 over 15 years ago . As systems get more powerful i personally want bigger & better.
-
I kinda agree here....the bigger matches are more fun
-
Maybe Bungie reduce the number of players vs on pvp mode to make lag free matches.
-
Love big team, but yeah, was my thought as well, ... that means small maps too
-
[quote]Maybe Bungie reduce the number of players vs on pvp mode to make lag free matches.[/quote] Its 2017. I can play matches in any battlefield game made since 4 with 60+ players and if my internet service is working i have no noticeable lag. Im not even asking for that kind of epic size, i'd be happy with 10vs10, 12vs12. Theres just no excuse.
-
Thats their idea of fixing lag
-
[quote]Thats their idea of fixing lag[/quote] Lol
-
A good way of giving the Halo fanboys what they want, without breaking the game for everyone else.
-
[quote]A good way of giving the Halo fanboys what they want, without breaking the game for everyone else.[/quote] Im a fan of halo, played since xmas morning 2001. "Big team battle" is a halo game mode, even 343i made it work in h4.
-
But the problem here is that you're dealing with a vocal minority within the PVP community who want the slower, team based play you had in 4v4 MP....and a faction within Bungie that was prepared to BREAK the current game trying to give it to them. Sometimes you can't get what you want, and need to settle for what you need. I'm willing to give up 6v6, if it that's the price I have to pay to get the Sandbox team to stop breaking the game trying to make 6v6 into something it can never be. I'll accept 4v4 if it means the rest of the game gets to remain healthy.
-
[quote]But the problem here is that you're dealing with a vocal minority within the PVP community who want the slower, team based play you had in 4v4 MP....and a faction within Bungie that was prepared to BREAK the current game trying to give it to them. Sometimes you can't get what you want, and need to settle for what you need. I'm willing to give up 6v6, if it that's the price I have to pay to get the Sandbox team to stop breaking the game trying to make 6v6 into something it can never be. I'll accept 4v4 if it means the rest of the game gets to remain healthy.[/quote] Well said. I just wish bungie was on par with Dice, that would be epic.
-
BTB was 8 v 8 not 6 v 6.
-
[quote]BTB was 8 v 8 not 6 v 6.[/quote] I know. I complained here for years after Destinys release that they couldnt even handle what 343i did with halo 4. Dice does 60+ player matches beautifully, youd think bungie could at least do 10vs10 or 12vs12.
-
I don't think 343i should be brought up since they are in the same hole as Bungie
-
Edited by THUNDERCHILD: 5/18/2017 8:07:32 PM[quote]I don't think 343i should be brought up since they are in the same hole as Bungie[/quote] Lol, all im saying is if [i]they[/i] can do it, bungie can too!
-
-
Ugh. And I tought 4v4 from the first Gears of War was boring.
