Jesus Christ, he didn't call you a liar. He was pointing out that the issue is there, but it is not being caused by third party applications or overlays.
It's his -blam!-ing JOB to tell us this stuff. If something is not true, he needs to say that it's not true. It's not a personal attack against you.
Grow a -blam!-ing spine.
English
-
correction, he indirectly called him a liar by answering to an allegation by op's post by stating that the allegations were not true. I do believe that's called a lie when then evidence supports the allegation. its also his job to be a community manager by interacting with the community, yet the only thing these clowns tell us is "we hear you guardians and were listening" but hardly ever address the core issues constantly brought up by the community. i think they need to grow a spine and admit when they -blam!-ed up not shift the blame or deny the issues exist.
-
Him saying it is not true does not mean that he was saying the OP was intentionally lying. There is a difference.
-
and how do you know what he meant? when responding to the main topic no response is addressed directly to the op so for all you know he could have meant just that. that's why i said "indirectly". i guess Cozmo wasnt intentionally lying either when he said it wasn't true yet all these bans seem to suggest otherwise.
-
Bro get off cosmos cock and stop defending these cons
-
But Cozmo was wrong. That’s [b]my[/b] issue. [spoiler]who gives a shit about this OP[/spoiler]