{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/25/2017 11:11:36 PM
2
So like. If you say the sky is blue and I say "that isn't true", you wouldn't say I'm calling you a liar?
English
-
No moron, i'd say you were incorrect, mistaken, misinformed, potentially color-blind. A lie requires intent to deceive, not simply being incorrect.
-
Do any of you dumb kids know what a false equivalence is?
-
Okay, then please prove to me how saying that something someone says is "not true" is not equivalent to calling that person a liar.
-
Being wrong doesn't automatically make you a liar. The fact that you need this explained to you is troubling. Ironically, the OP is a liar, as we see from this current topic, but Cozmo never called him one. He was just trying to stem the tide of flat out incorrect information that was and still is going on.
-
I find it hilarious, not troubling, that he is defending his stance when simple google definition would show how incorrect he is. Or, I guess technically by his logic...he's now the liar haha.
-
Okay, you are not thinking coherently. I never said being wrong made anyone a liar. I said that when X tells Y that what Y says isn't true, then X is saying that Y is lying. In the original post that Cozmo commented on, the OP was correct and Cozmo said that what the OP said was "not true". So, yes, again...Cozmo said he was lying and therefore called him a liar.
-
Nope. If I say "Pearl Harbor happened in June of 1942" and you say "That's not true. It was December." You're not necessarily calling me a liar. You're saying I'm incorrect regardless of my intentions. You really shouldn't need this explained to you. And FYI, the OP WAS and still is incorrect.
