https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJfChqnoUPU Postmodern trash is to believe the personal is the political and there is an OUGHT and one not separate them. That is evl and wrong and doesn't work well. This user can believe in G o d but not be religious and try to convert others to their religion to interact with them. SO MANY 'conservative'-minded individuals are such snowflake cry-bullies, aren't they? There are some seriously good comments in this comment section of this video...Don't feel pgeonholed or label others as something, just because X dips into Z and Y dips into Z does NOT make X and Y always be the same. Religious people have kylled, atheists have kylled. Both have rayped, both have STOLEN! Life, liberty, property, time, money, IT'S ALL THEFT! Theft implies personal property and agency is required to own property, because to own is to be able to not only have but to eat, to destroy. One cannot learn freedom in a cage their whole life. Therefore people CAN be pro-choice and pro-life at the same time. SOME pro-choicers are involved in hideous experiments and SOME pro-lifers are dishonest bullies who obfuscate and use pictures of late miscarriages to scare children of what aborshuns look like to guilt trip 'em to give up money to pay for merely another State, fused WITH religion, masculine AND feminine parenting, provided by the State, versus masculine VERSUS feminine States fighting it out for years. This user wants neither!!! One can be a Chrystyan-anarchist or an Islamo-anarchist, as per some in the comment section of this video. One can be libertine or traditional, it's the belief in personal agency and private property and options in defense, arbitration, credit, agriculture, and schooling and respecting the N.A.P that is the differentiating factor. Am personally leaning more towards the idea of intelligent design by an idea/force known as deity/Source, the Will to Exist itself, and Luv and Truth (action-process exposition devoid of equivocation with fact to deter without lying) known as 'G o d' and that there IS OBJECTIVE Evl in the realm, that which goes against the universe, namely regarding private property which is a part of Life and Self-Ownership, that which libertarianism advocates adherence to, attacked by mother-State doctrine-pushing liberal-minded individuals/collectives and protectionist male/father ruler-obsessed 'conservative'-minded individuals/collectives. The 'bet' of not needing religion or the State, mummy or papa government, to exercise ego control and live and luv in peace relative to one another with opposing views, empirical premises should be attacked NOT moral imperatives. Ergo, HOW a group of pro-capital punishment people interact with non-capital-punishment-pushing people in proximity to one another. Polycentricity and more freedom to get what one wants, good or service, without hurting another in a voluntary contract, best, in this user's mind and many others', facilitated by the private sector, unchained by a monopoly on arbitration, credit, defense, agriculture, and schooling known as the State. This user believes that only working within the framework of one religion, with a leader, without a universal philosophy, an idea, leads to chaos when that leader is gone or disproven, and those theologians in-charge pushing a one world government and one-world religion as humanity is forcefully transitioned into transhumanist computer simulations to cheat morality and death because certain trillionaires despise humanity and want uhs all ded or enslaved because they have no faith in themselves or others or the free market to fix itself to live sustainably on Earth without reaching tragedy of the commons/desertification, so mass deth and disease and stupidity is their only solution. This user does not subscribe to such Malthuhsian beliefs and Spenglrian and Hgelian Schmihdtian nonsense. Control freaks, all of them, 'left-right paradigm' muh AZZ!!! To believe in, let alone FORCE others to believe in, BOTH Objective Good and Objective Evl is fragile and to believe in, let alone FORCE others to believe in, SUBJECTIVE good and SUBJECTIVE evl; that both exist or neither exists, is an exercise in futility and chaos. There is objective evl, but what is good? The road to perdition. That's what it is paved with. One can be agnostic and theist and agnostic and atheist, although atheist implies making a positive claim, as being a theist implies making a leap of faith, of course people have the Right to do so, just don't force it upon others with coercion. That is usually antithetical to one's goals as it breeds resentment and, eventually, rebellion, BECAUSE NOT EVERYONE (HAS TO) BELIEVE(S) THE SAME THINGS ONE DOES, 100%!!! That doesn't stop people from marrying and having children and being happy and healthy and pleasured and leaving others alone!!!!!!! An invading collective does NOT necessitate a solute collectivization. When on defense, one is not needed, even individualism and more libertarianism should be ENCOURAGED, only when on offense and invading another country would collectivism POSSIBLY be encouraged. For the luv of shyt, re-read this. NO.SOCIAL.ENGINEERING.LET.ALONE.GENETIC.ENGINEERING.IS.REQUIRED!!!! Burn that into the fiber of yr beings, plz, kthxbye.